Debunking the Left’s Arguments on Abortion

By Debbie Wuthnow

Debunking the Left’s Arguments on Abortion

For many voters, a candidate’s position on abortion is a determining factor at the voting booth. After all, beliefs and actions regarding the right to life often indicate a candidate’s stance on other foundational rights. Whether the right to life should apply to our most vulnerable population, therefore, is a central question.

Although politicians regularly try to spin their positions on many issues, the abortion debate is particularly clouded with arguments that confuse and mislead. Therefore, it is crucial to discern not only a candidate’s beliefs but also the objective truth – and know how to defend your positions to your friends, family, and even others at your church who may hold a different position and may have an open heart.

The central pro-life argument is very simple:

  1. It is wrong to intentionally kill an innocent human being.
  2. Abortion intentionally kills an innocent human being.
  3. Therefore, abortion is wrong.

With this in mind, let’s debunk two of the main arguments for abortion:

  1. The unborn fetus is not a human being.
  2. It’s my body, so it’s my choice.

Let’s look at these one at time.

“The unborn fetus is not a human being.”

While this belief is often implied rather than explicitly stated, it provides the underlying basis for most pro-abortion arguments.

Have you noticed that the arguments used to justify killing an unborn child are never used to justify killing a toddler? Why not? Because those in favor of abortion do not consider an unborn child to be a human like a toddler.

But what is the unborn fetus if not a human being? Dr. C. Ward Kischer, former Professor Emeritus of Human Embryology at the University of Arizona College of Medicine, points out that “every human embryologist, worldwide, states that the life of the new individual human being begins at fertilization (conception).”

If life begins at conception—as science demonstrates—then that life must be fully human. If not, at what point do we become human? If our humanity is not inherently tied to our existence, consider the implications:

  • If humanity depends on the level of development, should children not be considered human because they are still developing?
  • If humanity depends on the degree of dependency, what about toddlers, the elderly, or the severely disabled?
  • If it depends on self-awareness, do people in a comatose state cease to be human?
  • If it depends on location, can we kill a baby minutes before birth?

Placing the beginning of human life at any point other than conception leaves human rights on shaky ground—for us outside the womb as well as those in the womb. It would mean that our humanity is not inherent, but conditional. Therefore, it can be lost if certain conditions are met. If our humanity can be lost, so can our inalienable rights.

Even if the unborn is regarded as a human being, however, many still argue that he or she has no right to the mother’s body. This is referenced by a second common pro-abortion argument:

“My body, my choice”

The slogan above is a major pro-abortion talking point. It attempts to cast abortion supporters as “pro-choice,” while framing supporters of life as “anti-choice.” For example, Planned Parenthood Action states:

“Our ability to control our health, our bodies, and our future is at stake.”

Pro-abortion talking points and policies often ignore the second human who is affected: the unborn baby. Therefore, we must ask, how many bodies are involved? Consider a C-section versus an appendectomy—is removing a baby from the mother equivalent to removing her appendix?

Many abortion supporters acknowledge that the unborn baby is a separate entity from the mother. Science confirms what common sense tells us, that the mother and the baby are distinct, different individuals with unique DNA. Still, they argue that she shouldn’t be forced to use her body to support her developing baby; therefore, her right to abortion remains intact. Is this a legitimate definition of rights? Doesn’t the fetus have rights? Remember, if the unborn fetus is a human being, then he or she inherently possesses human rights, including the right to life and protection from assault and battery.

If a mother has the right to harm or kill her baby in the name of bodily autonomy, it would logically follow that:

  • A mother should be able to abort her baby at nine months instead of giving birth (which is technically legal in several states).
  • A mother should be able to abort her unborn girl because she wanted a boy (as many tragically did in order to preserve the family name during China’s one-child policy).
  • If breastfeeding was a mother’s only available option to feed her newborn baby, she could refuse to use her body for that purpose, starving her baby in the name of bodily autonomy.

These horrific positions are where the “my body, my choice” argument ultimately leads.

In the end, always remember the basic argument: Intentionally killing an innocent human being is wrong. Abortion intentionally kills an innocent human being; therefore, abortion is wrong. No claim to bodily autonomy will change a foundational truth.

Abortion in the voting booth

The abortion debate deals with questions of rights, humanity, and ethics—all of which should be primary considerations of anyone evaluating candidates or seeking public office. It is not, as some argue, simply a matter of religious preference which does not belong in public policy.

iVoterGuide is committed to helping you discover what your candidates believe about this fundamental issue. The upcoming Dobbs v. Jackson Supreme Court case could potentially change the future of abortion laws in this country. With that in mind, what will your 2022 primary candidates believe about the right to life, and how will that inform their actions if elected? These questions must be answered, and we are eager to help you answer them.

Note: If you are looking for other great resources on the subject, we highly recommend Randy Alcorn's book, Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments.

Get Reminders

Whether it's important news, voting dates, or election reminders, iVoterGuide equips you to make an impact and a real difference in every election.
Join Now

See your voter guide

Spread the Word

You are the greatest influencer in politics today.
Share on social media.