
Marilyn Zayas
BIOGRAPHY
EDUCATION
University of Cincinnati College of Law, Cincinnati, J.D., 1997
CUNY, the City College of New York, New York, B.S. in Computer Science, 1987
WORK & MILITARY
Candidate did not provide
AFFILIATIONS
Board of Catholic Charities Southwestern Ohio, Board Member, University of Cincinnati College of Law Dean’s Advisory Board
Board Member, Board of Beech Acres Parenting Center, Board Member
The Refugee and Immigrant Law Center, Board Member, FBI Citizen’s Academy
Class of 2011, University of Cincinnati College of Law, Adjunct Professor
Cincinnati Ballet Board, Board Member, Ohio Supreme Court’s Board of Character and Fitness
POLITICAL OFFICES HELD
Judge, Ohio's First District Court of Appeals, 2016-current
POLITICAL OFFICES SOUGHT
Candidate did not provide
ENDORSEMENTS
LIBERAL (3)
Planned Parenthood Advocates of Ohio
Ohio Citizen Action
United Auto Workers UAW Region 2B
SELECTED CONTRIBUTIONS
CONSERVATIVE
GIVEN BY CANDIDATE (0)
RECEIVED BY CANDIDATE (1)
Jenny Schmitt (2022)
LIBERAL
GIVEN BY CANDIDATE (3)
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees (2023)
Jennifer Brunner (2022)
Marilyn Zayas (2018)
RECEIVED BY CANDIDATE (50)
America Works PAC (2022)
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (2022)
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees (2022)
American Federation of Teachers (2022)
American Nurses Association (2022)
OTHER INFORMATION
Judge Zayas has served on the Ohio First District Court of Appeals since 2016.
Info From Other Sources:
- Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey
- "My judicial reputation is that I consider the perspectives of all involved, and faithfully apply the law and our constitution. My goal is to continue to build a judicial reputation that protects the integrity of the court and inspires others from nontraditional backgrounds to pursue law careers."
- Said that the three key messages of her campaign are:
- "Judicial Independence and Integrity: When people come to court, they want an equal opportunity to be heard and an independent judge who will fully and fairly resolves the case. My judicial philosophy is to faithfully apply the law and our constitution equally to all, independent of outside influence or partisan pressure. Politics have no role to play in our judiciary. My judicial record shows that I thoroughly review the facts of each case, analyze and apply the law as written, and understand that each decision affects people of all walks of life throughout the varied communities of Ohio’s 88 counties. My priority is to ensure that the law is applied fairly and consistently, with integrity, independence, and common sense."
- "Courts that are Accountable and Accessible: I will support and advance the justice reform initiatives introduced by our current Chief Justice to enlarge accountability, transparency and access. This includes creating a state-wide, public access sentencing database where you can review sentences across the counties for similar offenses with similar circumstances. I am also interested in advancing initiatives that work towards eliminating bias in our justice system. Additionally, I will seek ways to support and enlarge the use of specialized dockets that have proven to be successful in helping people get on their feet and to reduce crimes on our community. This includes the mental health, veterans, and drug courts."
- "Courts that work for you: It is important to have judges with a variety of backgrounds and perspectives to ensure that each issue is carefully and completely reviewed. I bring a unique perspective to the court, which comes from my 6 years of experience as an appellate judge, my 20 years of experience advocating for clients, and my underprivileged background. Our state deserves a justice from a background and circumstances that represent many of the Ohioans the court serves, who has the courage to take on challenging issues with an independent and common-sense approach focused on maintaining the integrity of our judiciary."
- In an earlier survey, Judge Zayas said, "My legal philosophy is to be faithful to the law. Politics should have no role to play in our judiciary. It is of paramount importance to me that I thoroughly review the facts and evidence of each case, analyze and apply the law as written, and to ensure a just and fair resolution. Public trust and confidence in the judiciary is achieved through transparency. My team of staff attorneys and I work very hard to ensure that our decisions are detailed, well-analyzed, and rooted in the law. By clearly and concisely explaining our decisions to the parties, we best ensure that they can move on with their lives, regardless of the case’s outcome, because their case was fully and fairly resolved."
- Posted on Facebook that she was endorsed by unions
- Posted on Facebook, "As Pride Month is winding down, we want to take this opportunity to highlight a young leader in the LGBTQIA+ community that is making a big difference in Ohio! Thank you Lexi Hayman-Staples for all that you do! #HappyPride2022"
QUESTIONNAIRE
RIGHT TO LIFE
Was Dobbs v. Jackson rightly decided according to the text of the Constitution? Please explain. (Holding: In Dobbs, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the federal constitution does not confer a right to abortion.)
Did not answer
Does the federal Constitution support the right to physician assisted suicide? Please explain in light of Washington v. Glucksberg (1997).
Did not answer
Human life deserves legal protection from conception until natural death.
Did not answer
How do you view the judiciary’s role in matters of abortion regulation following Dobbs?
Did not answer
RELIGIOUS LIBERTY
Do you believe religious liberty is at risk in the United States. If so, what is the judiciary's proper role in addressing this issue?
Did not answer
Does the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment require government to be strictly secular or does it allow for the nation's religious heritage?
Did not answer
Was Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission rightly decided according to the text of the Constitution? Please explain. (Holding: The U.S. Supreme Court held tha the state may not show religious hostility when enforcing anti-discrimination laws against a business owner.)
Did not answer
VALUES
Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.
Did not answer
What is your understanding of parental rights under the Constitution regarding the upbringing of children, particularly regarding choices about education and sexual identity?
Did not answer
Is gender identity a protected class under the Constitution? Please explain the constitutional basis for your view.
Did not answer
ABOUT YOU
Have you ever been convicted of a felony? If so, please explain.
Did not answer
Have you ever been penalized for sexual misconduct in either civil or criminal court? If so, please explain.
Did not answer
I voted in these primaries and general elections:
Did not answer
JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY
Describe your judicial philosophy.
Did not answer
Do you believe judges should primarily apply the law according to its original public meaning, or do you believe the law evolves over time to reflect contemporary values?
Did not answer
Which current or past U.S. Supreme Court justice best reflects your judicial philosophy?
Did not answer
Was Obergefell v. Hodges rightly decided according to the text of the Constitution? Please explain. (Holding: The U.S. Supreme Court held Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses create a right for same-sex couples to marry.)
Did not answer
A. How should a judge approach a case where the constitutional or statutory text is clear on its face? B. Conversely, how should a judge proceed when the text is ambiguous or silent on a disputed issue?
Did not answer
What is your view of judicial restraint versus judicial activism? How do you define each?
Did not answer
What is the proper role of a judge?
Did not answer
When applying or interpreting the text of a statute or constitutional provision, is it ever proper for a judge to consider present day public opinion or consequences?
Did not answer
If precedent departs from the Constitution’s text or original meaning, should a judge follow it or correct the error? Please explain.
Did not answer
CRIMINAL JUSTICE & PUBLIC SAFETY
The burden of proof in a criminal case is generally that the state must provide proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Some say the reason the burden of proof is so high is because we greatly value ensuring that the innocent are not unjustly imprisoned. Please comment on this topic.
Did not answer
When reviewing wrongful conviction claims, what role, if any, should judges play in determining remedies?
Did not answer
2ND AMENDMENT
What is your understanding of the Second Amendment’s right to keep and bear arms?
Did not answer
OTHER IMPORTANT ISSUES
Which branch of government do you believe was intended to wield the most authority?
Did not answer
If you are not already receiving our updates, stay current with important election alerts, educational articles, and encouraging reminders.
Invest in America’s Future
Join the movement to restore biblical values and constitutional principles in our nation by informing and mobilizing more faith-based voters with the truth.